Chemical Warfare and Drug experiment Volunteers from Cold War
Fri Feb 22, 2008 at 11:31:37 PM PDT
Below is the list of expectation that the men expect that Congress and the Veterans Administration will agree to in light of recent developments world wide, the recent settlement of the British Porton Downs veterans the British version of Edgewood Arsenal. The Canadians settled their case with the veterans of Gagetown in 2006 also Gagetown was the Canadian version of Edgewood Arsenal.
These governments used fewer soldiers, and as far as we can tell, did not have their spy agencies involved the way the C.I.A. was in the Edgewood experiments nor funded the way DR Gottlieb funded the Edgewood "mind control experiments" which leads the "Edgewood Veterans Expectations" to be higher than the British or Canadian settlements, also both countries have "universal health care" and they are their families are cared for, unlike our veterans who have to be service connected for their medical problems to be cared for, it seems as for the past 50 plus years the Edgewood veterans did not nor could NOT make claims for medical care or compensation. I will explain below.
The 7120 men of the Edgewood experiments that lasted from 1955 thru 1975, all signed national Security Act agreements, which as it was explained to us, that if we violated them we would go to Leavenworth Prison for at least 25 years, no maybe's, "do not pass go do not collect 200" just plan on going away, your life as you knew it would be over.
It was explained in detail when we "volunteered" for the assignment that we could not tell our wives, parents, friends, chain of command, treating doctors, etc. Even in a notification letter in September 2006 from the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA)there was a paragraph included from the Department of Defense reminding us of the National Security Agreements we had signed from 30-50 plus years ago, and they they were allowing us now only to speak to physicians treating us for medical problems, yet we could not discuss the dosages need for weapons or any other classified data. As for myself, I didn't KNOW any classified data, nor do I think any of the other "volunteers did either" Given the fact that this program had been investigated by the Church Committee in 1975/1976 by Senator Frank Church of Idaho, the Nelson Rockefeller Commission of 1975, the Veterans at Risk report by the National Academies of Science in 1993 and the Rockefeller Commission of 1994. There was also the 1991 CBS Sixty Minutes episode about the experiments that was done while I was deployed to Desert Storm.
The real kicker as far as the National Security Agreement arguments went out the window as far as I am concerned when Doctor James Ketchum, the last living scientist of the Edgewood experiments released this self published book in February 2007 Chemical Warfare: Secrets Almost Forgotten he even lays out chemical equations in the book, now that's about as classified as it gets.
There is nothing I or any of the other "test vets" could expose at this point that could violate the National Security Acts, just other than embarassment to Donald Rumsfeld, or Dick Cheney since they were involved with these human experiments while part of President Gerald Fords White House in 1974 and 1975, before the program was stopped, and both were involved in creating a "cover story" for the CIA for the Frank Olson family in regards to the death of Frank Olson who worked for DR Sidney Gottleib at Fort Detrick and was involved in LSD experiments and mind control and was killed in such a way as to make it appear to be a suicide in November 1953, yet, the Ford White House helped the CIA some up with a plausible explanation for the Olson family to be given by CIA Director Helmsley just before Congress gave the family a large check to apologize for the loss of Frank Olson, (can we say pay off).
At this point we veterans have been trying to tell our side of the story and here are the "expectations" the Edgewood Test Veterans would like to see.
We Expect: Justice in the form of an apology from the C.I.A.,
DOD and the U.S. Army, from the Commmander in
Chief, the President of the United States, for
acts committed against us, none of which can be
deemed honest errors in judgement. President
Clinton apologized to others, but not the
Edgewood Veterans specifically.
We Expect: In the interest of Justice, that the Congress
must create a new law, within CFR38 and/or
direct the Department of Veterans Administration
to place Edgewood Volunteers, who are not already
in a higher category for treatment, into mandatory
Care category 6 along with Operation WhiteCoat
SHAD and Operation 112 veterans. In July 2006 we
were briefly placed in category 6, but then were
quickly withdrawn from the designation. We require
a care window of a mimimum ten years, as at times
it takes the VARO's to adjudicate as is the case
with most of the Edgewood Veterans, once they
initiate a claim, and has been experienced by more
than one veteran in this group.
a.) In the interests of Justice, for servicemen
and women, Congress must look at and fairly
rewrite the "Feres Doctrine" that prevents
military members or family members from suing
on behalf of injured active duty military
incidents, when the conduct is outrageous and
criminal and is not based on operational
considerations.
We Expect: To receive the medals that many of us were
promised at our orientations, and to which we
earned thru our actions and sacrifices. To
validate our service and some deserve the
Soldiers Medal for Heroism, many deserve the
Army Commendation Medal with the V device for
Heroism, and the rest have earned the Army
Commendation Medal just by volunteering for the
assignment.
In Lieu of this, the DOD and the C.I.A. should consider
decorating the Edgewood Volunteers out of medals in their own inventory and or the Congress should consider the creation a Special Congressional medal thereby putting an end to our need for service validation and government bickering over responsibility and culpability. You see, the veterans and their families need to demonstrably know what we gave was not for naught.
Army awards should be based on the stricture of the laws written by Congress, authorizing them rather than evolving criteria, regulations, and traditions beyond Congressional intent, when those laws were enacted. The HRC Army Awards Branch has denied us our due based on policies and regulations which they believe disqualifies heroic and extraordinary service to this nation.
We Expect: That retroactively, for those already on VA
disability, and when claims for compensation
are adjudicated for others, to be compensated
from the date the injury occurred, not as is
present practice, from the date of filing of the
claim, because of the security non-disclosure
statements we signed back in the 50, 60s and 70s
wrongfully prevented us from filing earlier
compensation claims and we believe that was
calculatedly unjust.
We Expect: Compensation from the Central Intelligence Agency
due to it's failure to notify us of it's legal
obligation to assist and compensate us since 1977
when the Agency promised Congress that they would
notify "unwitting subjects" during the Church
Committee Hearings.The CIA MORI DOC 1451843
proves beyond a reasonable doubt that those of us
in the K program were unwitting and that they
placed us at risk by knowingly subjecting us to
drugs with unfavorable side effects. CIA documents
further prove that Edgewood furnished them it's
database containing our names and ID's. The CIA
promise to Congress constitutes a "Promissary
Note" to Edgewood veterans. Admiral Turner wrote
to the Army Secretary stating that he "assumed"
the Army was making the notifications thereby
shirking from his responsibility in the feigned
belief that the Army would pay the costs involved.
The Agency funded the programs thus: CIA oversight
at Edgewood should have discovered that our
consents were made nugatory, because the
volunteer's which were dishonest by including
the words "I am aware of all hazards" Obvious
it is, hazards were unknown or unknowable.
Volunteers must be given a ten year window
for VA claims adjudication and those claims
that are linked to volunteer service exposures
resulting in 50% or greater overall disabilities
expect compensation by arbitration and those with
less that 50% expect proportional compensation
for harms, injuries and suffering caused.
We have grown old waiting for our government to do the right thing. Ours was not intended to be a duty; therefore is was supererogatory and not al all "incident to military service" thought it was similarily stressful to combat, because many of us were unwitting CIA drug experimentation subjects. The harms caused us cannot be repaired, and the loss suffered cannot be made good by a simple award of damages. A large part of the harms and injuries were done to our individuality and our dignity as human beings. Relief represents a social vindication of the human spirit thus threatened, rather than recompense for loss suffered.
Call to action: Please send a copy of this to your Congressman and Senators and tell them it is time to correct this injustice, that these veterans and their families have been ignored for too long. That we as citizens expect the "PROMISE" to be kept.